Welcome to your weekly round-up of the pick of the content published on EG Legal over the past seven days.
This week, we start a four-part series on forfeiture, with a look at two knotty issues relating to forfeiture and rent. In addition, we explore the return of landlords’ rights for non-payment of unprotected commercial rent debts, as well as highlighting the differences in legislative approaches between Scotland and England in recovering pandemic-related rent arrears.
This month’s Back to Basics column provides a timely reminder on the range of remedies available for tenant breach, while April’s Q&A column responds to a question on how the new binding arbitration scheme will work under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act. And last, but by no means least, our case coverage continues with a Legal Note on an Access to Neighbouring Land Act case, as well as a wealth of Practice Points and case summaries.
Legal news
Prison sentence for developer who showed ‘blatant disregard’ for planning rules
A roofer redeveloped a site in Essex despite court orders telling him to stop
Legal features
Legal Q&A: How will the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act work?
James Hanham and Joseph Green answer a question on the arbitration scheme
Doubling down on forfeiture
Peter Petts and Jamal Demachkie consider two knotty issues concerning forfeiture and rent
Covid rent arrears: to forfeit, or not to forfeit?
Joanna Lampert and Michael Clarke reflect on the return of landlords’ rights for non-payment of unprotected commercial rent debts
Back to Basics: Landlords’ remedies for tenant breach
Now that the moratorium on forfeiture has lifted, landlords have a choice of options again. By Helena Davies and Oskar Musial
Rent arrears: The north-south divide
Edward Gratwick and Craig Falconer explore the differences in pandemic-related rent arrears legislation between Scotland and England
Legal Notes: Arguments about access to land
Louise Clark addresses the approach to applications under the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992
Practice points
‘Subject to contract’ negotiations: has an agreement been reached?
Johnson v Spooner and another
Dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent works
Marshall v Northumberland & Durham Property Trust Ltd
Enforceability of inter-RTM company agreements on multi-block estates
G & A Gorrara Ltd and others v Kenilworth Court Block E RTM Co Ltd
Contractual notices: the need to comply with contractual requirements
PJP(NE) Ltd v Taylor
Freedom of expression plays no part in conviction for aggravated trespass
Director of Public Prosecutions v Cuciurean
Equitable liens must be protected by registration
James Fish and Craig Johns (as joint administrators of Sky Apartments 2018 Ltd) v Sky Apartments 2018 Ltd and others
Rent determination: substantial compliance
Johnson v Richmond Housing Partnership Ltd
Case summaries
Johnson v Richmond Housing Partnership Ltd
Landlord and tenant – Determination of rent – Jurisdiction
Two Rivers Housing v Sanders
Landlord and tenant – Service charges – Construction of lease
Law reports
Dunbabin and others v Dunbabin
Property – Beneficial joint tenancy – Severance
Gill and another v Royal Borough of Greenwich
Housing – Civil penalty – Joint landlords
For more legal articles and to search our extensive archive, visit EG Legal
To send feedback, e-mail jess.harrold@eg.co.uk or tweet @EGPropertyNews