Re London Scottish Finance Ltd (in administration); Jack and another v Craig and others

Loan – Unenforceable secured loan — Consumer protection — Claimants being appointed as joint administrators of company – Claimants applying to court for directions in respect of unenforceable loan agreements made or acquired by company prior to administration — Whether debtors entitled to repayment of money paid to company under loan agreements — Whether unfair relationship existing between defendants and company — Whether payments being made out of proceeds of realisation of security – Application granted

Christoforou and another v Standard Apartments Ltd

UTLC Case Number: LRX/84/2012 and LRX/88/2012. TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007. LANDLORD AND TENANT administration charges – costs of legal proceedings whether recoverable under indemnity covenant whether within s.11, Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 whether affected by paragraph 10(4) of Schedule 12 to Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 adequacy of leasehold valuation tribunals reasons -.

Hunston Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another

Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWCA Civ 1610Case No: C1/2013/2734IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURTHIS HONOUR JUDGE PELLING QC (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court)CO 4686 2013 Royal Courts of JusticeStrand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 12/12/2013Before : LORD JUSTICE MAURICE KAYLORD JUSTICE RYDERandSIR DAVID KEENE- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -Between : City and District Council of St AlbansAppellant – and – The Queen (on the application of) Hunston Properties LimitedSecretary of State for Communities and Local Government and anr 1st Respondent 2nd Respondent- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Matthew Reed (instructed by the Appellant’s Head of Legal Services) for the AppellantPaul Stinchcombe QC and Ned Helme (instructed by Photiades Solicitors) for the First Respondent and (Treasury Solicitors for the Second Respondent).  The Second Respondent did not appear.