Stuart Pemble | 13/04/2013 | 07:00 | Feature
Stuart Pemble considers whether a case involving delay by an engineer signals a possible change in the law on the recoverability of damages caused by a volatile property market
Stuart Pemble | 02/03/2013 | 07:00 | Feature
Stuart Pemble considers two recent cases which clarify how the courts will allow valuers leeway before deciding that they have been negligent
Stuart Pemble | 09/02/2013 | 07:00 | Feature
Stuart Pemble considers how the courts might imply an agreement to arbitrate into a contract
Allyson Colby and James Driscoll | 15/12/2012 | 07:00 | Feature
Legal notes round-up: Allyson Colby and James Driscoll reflect on another year in the courts and pick their judicial highlights
Stuart Pemble and Martino Giaquinto | 02/07/2011 | 09:00 | Feature
Construction contracts Stuart Pemble and Martino Giaquinto argue that extending adjudication to oral contracts may not be as sweeping as commentators suggest
Stuart Pemble and Susie Wilson | 10/07/2010 | 09:00 | Feature
Commercial debts A decision on interest rates for late payment is an important part of a judgment that is noted for other reasons. By Stuart Pemble and Susie Wilson
Stuart Pemble and Caroline Foster | 22/08/2009 | 09:00 | Feature
Net contribution clauses often lead to protracted disputes and many parties consider them to be unfair. Stuart Pemble and Caroline Foster discuss a recent case on the issue, which they consider controversial
Stuart Pemble and Melanie Parker | 20/12/2008 | 09:00 | Feature
The construction industry can be its own worst enemy. Stuart Pemble and Melanie Parker consider the problems that arise when parties fail to document their agreements properly
Stuart Pemble | 09/08/2008 | 09:00 | Feature
A Construction Act adjudication may appear to be dealing with simple facts, but it can result in complex legal analysis. Stuart Pemble investigates
Stuart Pemble and Ed Callaghan | 07/07/2007 | 00:00 | Feature
Construction Act adjudication has been considered by the House of Lords, whose decision has divided commentators, including the authors of this article. Stuart Pemble and Ed Callaghan agree to disagree