<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>| EG Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>EGi News and EGi Legal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 20:22:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to hear Habitats Regulation case</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/supreme-court-to-hear-habitats-regulation-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Lumley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The case is centred on environmental laws that are believed to be slowing down housebuilding]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPVRG Ltd v Pembrokeshire County Council</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/spvrg-ltd-v-pembrokeshire-county-council/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Town and country planning – Planning permission – Reasons – Defendant local authority granting planning permission for extension of existing caravan park in conflict with local plan policy contrary to recommendation of planning officer – Claimant seeking to quash decision – Whether defendant giving adequate reasons for decision – Whether defendant’s approach to issue of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge grants order stopping narrowboats delaying £6bn regen project</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/judge-grants-order-stopping-narrowboats-delaying-6bn-regen-project/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Enfield Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meridian Water]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The order was granted at the request of Enfield Council]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tenancy documents and deemed service</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/tenancy-documents-and-deemed-service/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The deemed service provisions of s7 Interpretation Act 1978 do  not apply where a statute requires a document to be given to a person but does not expressly refer to delivery being by post Kahn and Kahn v Elena D’Aubigny [2025] EWCA Civ 11 [2025]PLSCS 15 highlights the importance of service provisions within tenancy agreements. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patarkatsishvili and another v Woodward-Fisher</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/patarkatsishvili-and-another-v-woodward-fisher/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Contract – Sale of land – Fraudulent misrepresentation – Claimants discovering moth infestation following purchase of property from defendant – Claimants seeking rescission of contract and damages for fraudulent misrepresentation – Whether moths being vermin infestation – Whether defendant falsely or recklessly replying to pre-contract enquiries – Whether claimants induced to purchase property – Whether [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtyard RTM Co Ltd and others v Rockwell (FC103) Ltd and another; 14 Park Crescent Ltd and another v 14 Park Crescent RTM Co Ltd</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/courtyard-rtm-co-ltd-and-others-v-rockwell-fc103-ltd-and-another-14-park-crescent-ltd-and-another-v-14-park-crescent-rtm-co-ltd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Landlord and tenant – Right to manage – Qualifying rules – RTM companies claiming right to manage parts of buildings – First-tier tribunals ruling on whether premises self-contained within section 72(3)-(4) of Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 – RTM companies and landlords appealing – Whether part of building constituting vertical division of building – [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Law Commission consults on compulsory purchase</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/the-law-commission-consults-on-compulsory-purchase/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look at the Law Commission’s consultation paper on compulsory purchase]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The age-old question: what is a building?</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/the-age-old-question-what-is-a-building/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can more than one structure can constitute a “building” for the purposes of the right of first refusal ]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purchasers entitled to rescission for failure to disclose moth infestation</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/purchasers-entitled-to-rescission-for-failure-to-disclose-moth-infestation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Being reckless or dishonest in replies to pre-contract enquiries amounts to fraudulent misrepresentation entitling a purchaser to rescind the contract and obtain damages. The High Court has considered this issue in Iya Patarkatsishvili and another v William Woodward-Fisher [2025] EWHC 265 (Ch). The case concerned the claimants’ purchase of a house in Ladbroke Road, London [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long established hedge did form the boundary line</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/long-established-hedge-did-form-the-boundary-line/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A plan “for identification only” is admissible as an aid to construction but is not, of itself, the document being construed unlike a plan that “more particularly delineates” which has primacy over the words in the instrument. The High Court has considered this issue rejecting an appeal in Stiaan Van Zyl and another v Peter [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment: Where America leads…</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/investment-where-america-leads/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The political and economic climate is giving rise to a surge of interest among US investors in the UK]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SGL 1 Ltd v FSV Freeholders Ltd and others</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/sgl-1-ltd-v-fsv-freeholders-ltd-and-others-3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Landlord and tenant – Leasehold enfranchisement – Right to acquire freehold – Landlord proposing to sell freehold interest in four blocks of flats – Landlord serving two offer notices on qualifying tenants – Claimant purchaser seeking declaratory relief that notices valid – Whether blocks forming one, two, or more “buildings” for purposes of Part 1 [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd v On Tower UK Ltd</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/ap-wireless-ii-uk-ltd-v-on-tower-uk-ltd-5/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Telecommunications – Electronic communications code – New agreement – Respondent assignee of licence agreements seeking new code agreement rights – First-tier Tribunal deciding as preliminary issue that respondent was person with standing to apply for new agreement – Appellant site provider appealing – Whether assignee of benefit of licence being an operator “who is party [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>View from the bar: Learning from history on land value capture</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/view-from-the-bar-learning-from-history-on-land-value-capture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[green belt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Proposals to fund public projects through taxing development land run the risk of repeating mistakes]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Habitats Regulations and offshore wind</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/habitats-regulations-and-offshore-wind/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Offshore wind]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1272000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rob Garden completes his look at strategic planning to meet the country’s net zero targets]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developer loses court battle over £32m Notting Hill mansion infested with moths</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/developer-loses-court-battle-over-32-million-notting-hill-mansion-infested-with-moths/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Lumley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Notting Hill]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1271992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Court rules in favour of new owners who discovered infestation after moving in]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanuszek v Bunyan (Listing Officer) (No 2)</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/stanuszek-v-bunyan-listing-officer-no-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1271951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Council tax – Listing – Residential property]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>R (on the application of Bano) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/r-on-the-application-of-bano-v-waltham-forest-london-borough-council/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1271947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Local authority - Housing]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>R (on the application of Amalgamated Smart Metering Ltd) v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/r-on-the-application-of-amalgamated-smart-metering-ltd-v-rotherham-metropolitan-borough-council/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1271776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Practice and procedure – Judicial review – Extension of time – Defendant local authority granting interested party developer planning permission for residential development – Claimant seeking judicial review and applying to extend time for filing claim – Defendant and interested party applying for declaration that court had no jurisdiction – Whether court having jurisdiction – [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>R (on the application of Holohan and another) v Secretary of State for Transport and another</title>
		<link>https://www.egi.co.uk/legal/r-on-the-application-of-holohan-and-another-v-secretary-of-state-for-transport-and-another/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.egi.co.uk/?post_type=legal-article&#038;p=1271755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Property – Lease – Judicial review – Defendant secretary of state acquiring listed building in connection with HS2 rail scheme – Claimants requesting lease of property – Defendant refusing request – Claimants seeking judicial review and interim relief – Whether defendant taking account of irrelevant information – Whether refusal irrational – Whether procedures followed in [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>